![]() the subject at hand), or are you talking about your personal experience with some other emulation of digital gear? If the former: are you talking about the wavestation and/or M1 Korg Legacy plugins (i.e. Most people, however, just seem to get lost, bored, and frustrated.Įven something as simple as rewriting an algorithm in a different programming language can bring some differences.Are you talking from experience, or is this some academic theoretical viewpoint? If the latter: fine, but I'm not very interested. It can really add that something to the right types of tracks. If you have programming chops, patience, and like to read manuals the Wavestation is an excellent find. Tip, it's really, really important to have a good grasp of programming prior to getting a Wavestation however, if you find something like a JX-3P without an external programmer a "daunting" experience. The Wavestation is capable of surprisingly original, shifting, impossible-to-get-anywhere-else sound evolutions. If the idea of meticulously programming wavesequences, keeping track of the different "levels" of programming (wavesequence/patch/performance) to avoid mucking up your other patches, and juggling the wide range of options available sounds appealing to you-by all means get one. You want to stay far away from the presets because the good ones have been used to death and the bad ones suck really hard for any real music purposes. That being said, if you stick with its strengths of vectors and wavesequences you stand to gain the most from a WS. The Wavestation can do ROMPLER sounds but you run the risk of sounding very, very dated, although some "sound sandwiches" that pile on oscillators can be useful at times. There are two things that define its sound: wavesequences and vectoring. You should really know what it's all about, what it can do, what it can't do (sound analog), and how it does it in order to decide if you, in fact, really want or need it. The Wavestation is a specialized instrument.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |